man PPI::Tokenizer () - The Perl Document Tokenizer
NAME
PPI::Tokenizer - The Perl Document Tokenizer
SYNOPSIS
# Create a tokenizer for a file, array or string $Tokenizer = PPI::Tokenizer->new( 'filename.pl' ); $Tokenizer = PPI::Tokenizer->new( \@lines ); $Tokenizer = PPI::Tokenizer->new( \$source );
# Return all the tokens for the document my $tokens = PPI::Tokenizer->all_tokens;
# Or we can use it as an iterator while ( my $Token = $Tokenizer->get_token ) { print "Found token '$Token'\n"; }
# If we REALLY need to manually nudge the cursor, you # can do that to (The lexer needs this ability to do rollbacks) $Tokenizer->increment_cursor; $Tokenizer->decrement_cursor;
DESCRIPTION
PPI::Tokenizer is the class that provides Tokenizer objects for use in breaking strings of Perl source code into Tokens.
By the time you are reading this, you probably need to know a little about the different between how perl parses Perl code and how PPI parsers Perl documents.
Perl itself (the intepreter) uses a heavily modified lex specification to specify it's parsing logic, maintains state as it goes, and both tokenises and lexes AND EXECUTES at the same time. In fact, it's provably impossible to use perl's parsing method without BEING perl.
This is where the truism Only perl can parse Perl comes form.
PPI uses a completely different approach by abandoning the ability to provably parse perl perfectly, and instead to parse as a document and get so close that unless you do insanely silly things, it can handle it.
It was touch and go for a long time whether we could get it close enough, but in the end it turned out that it could be done.
In this approach, PPI::Tokenizer is seperate from the lexer PPI::Lexer. The job of PPI::Tokenizer is to take pure source as a string and break it up into a stream/set of tokens.
The Tokenizer uses a hell of a lot of heuristics, guessing, and cruft, supported by a very VERY flexible API.
HOW THE TOKENIZER WORKS
Understanding the Tokenizer is not for the feint-hearted. It is by far the most complex and twisty piece of perl I've ever seen. You probably want to skip this section.
But if you really want to understand, well then here goes.
Source Input and Clean Up
The Tokenizer starts by taking source in a variety of forms, sucking it all in and merging into one big string, and doing our own internal line split, using a special universal newline which allows the Tokenizer to take source for any platform, and even supports a few known types of broken newlines caused by mixed mac/pc/*nix editor screw ups.
The resulting array of lines is used to feed the tokenizer, and manually accessed by the heredoc-logic to do the line-oriented part of here-doc support.
Doing Things the Old Fashioned Way
Due to the complexity of perl, and after 2 previously aborted parser attempts, in the end the tokenizer was fashioned around a line-buffered character-by-character method.
That is, the Tokenizer pulls and holds a line at a time into a line buffer, and then iterates a cursor along it. At each cursor position, a method is called in whatever token class we are currently in, which will examine the character at the current position, and handle it.
As the handler methods in the various token classes are called, they build up a output token array for the source code.
Until someone else with more formal training in parsers cares to name it, I am labelling it a character by character heuristic tokenizer.
Various parts of the Tokenisier use look-ahead, arbitrary-distance look-behind (although currently the maximum is three significant tokens), or both, and various other heuristic guesses.
State Variables
Aside from the current line and the character cursor, the Tokenizer maintains a number of different state variables.
- Current Class
- The Tokenizer maintains the current token class at all times. Much of the time is just going to be the Whitespace class, which is what the base of a document is. As the tokenizer executes the various character handlers, the class changes a lot as it moves a long. In fact, in some instances, the character handler may not handle the character directly itself, but rather change the current class and then hand off to the character handler for the new class. Because of this, and some other things I'll deal with later, the number of times the character handlers are called does not in fact have a direct relationship to the number of characters in the document.
- Current Zone
- Rather than create a zone stack to allow for infinitely nested layers of classes, the Tokenizer recognises just a single layer. To put it a different way, in various parts of the file, the Tokenizer will recognise different base or substrate classes. When a Token such as a comment is finalised by the tokenizer, it falls back to the base state. This allows proper tokenisation of special areas such as __DATA__ and __END__ blockd, which also contain things like comments and POD, without allowing the creation of any significant Tokens inside these areas. For the main part of a document we use PPI::Token::Whitespace for this, with the idea being that code tokens are floating in a sea of whitespace.
- Current Token
- The final main state variable is the current token. This is the Token that is currently being assembled by the Tokenizer. For certain types, it can be manipulated and morphed and change class quite a bit while being assembled. When the Tokeniser is confidant that it has seen the end of the Token, it will be finalized, which adds it to the output token array and resets the current class to that of the zone that we are currently in. I should also note at this point that the current token variable is optional. The Tokenizer is capable of knowing what class it is currently set to, without actually having accumulated and characters in the Token.
Making It Faster
As I'm sure you can imagine, calling several different methods for each character and running regexs and other complex heuristics made the first fully working version of the tokenizer extremely slow.
During testing, I created a metric to measure parsing speed called LPGC, or lines per gigacycle . A gigacycle is simple a billion CPU cycles on a typical single-core CPU, and so a Tokenizer running at 1000 lines per gigacycle would generate 1200 lines of tokenized code when running on a 1200Ghz processor.
The first working version of the tokenizer ran at only 350 LPGC, so to tokenizer a typical large module such as ExtUtils::MakeMaker took 10-15 seconds. This sluggishness made it unpractical for many uses.
So in the current parser, there are 3 layers of optimisation very carefully built in to the basic. This has brought the tokenizer up to a more reasonable 1000 LPGC, at the expense of making it a lot twistier.
Making It Faster - Whole Line Classification
The first step in the optimisation process was to at a hew handler to enable several of the more basic classes (whitespace, comments) to be able to be parsed a line at a time. At the start of each line, a special handler (only supported by a few classes) is called to check and see if the entire line can be parsed in one go.
This is used mainly to handle things like POD, comments, empty lines, and a few other minor special cases.
Making It Faster - Inlining
The first stage of the optimisation involved inlining a small number of critical methods that were repeated an extremely high number of times. Profiling had suggested that the method calls were running at about 1,000,000 per gigacycle, and by cutting these by two thirds, a signficant speed improvement, in the order of 50% was gained.
You may notice that many other the methods in this class itself look very nested and long hand. This is primarily due to the inlining.
At around this time, some statistics code that existed in the early versions of the parser was also removed, as it was determined that it was consuming around 15% of the CPU for the entire parser, while making the core more complicated.
A judgement call was made that with the difficulties likely to be encountered with future planned enhancements, and given the relatively high cost involved, the statistics features would be removed from the Tokenizer.
Making It Faster - Quote Engine
Once inline had reached diminishingreturns, it became ovious from the profiling results that a huge amount of time was being spent stepping a char at a time though long and boring code such as comments,
The existing regex engine was expanded to also encompass quotes and other quote-like things, and added a special abstract base class that provided a number of specialised parsing methods that would scan ahead, looking out ahead to find the nd of a string, and updating the cursor at the end to leave the cursor in a valid position for the next vall.
In the current version, this code is still much slower than it could be, and post-1.0 I will be seeking volunteers to help port some of this quote-engine code to C for additional speed.
This is also the point at which the number of character handler calls began to greatly differ from the number of characters. But it has been done in a way that allows the parser to retain the power of the original version at the critical points, while skipping through the boring bits as needed for additional speed.
The addition of this feature allowed the tokenizer to exceed 1000 LPGC for the first time. As it became evident that great speed increases were available by using this skipping ahead mechanism, a new handler method was added that explicitly handles the parsing of an entire token, where the structure of the token is relatively simple. Tokens such as symbols fit this case, as once we are passed the initial sygil and word char, we know that we can skip ahead and complete the rest of the token much more easily.
A number of these have been added for most or possibly all of the common cases, with most of these complete handlers implemented using regular expressions.
In fact, so many have been added that at this point, you could arguably reclassify the tokenizer as a hybrid regex, char-by=char heuristic tokenizer. More tokens are now consumed in complete methods in a typical program than are handled by the normal char-by-char methods.
Many of the these complete-handlers were implemented during the writing of the Lexer, and this has allowed the full parser to maintain around 1000 LPGC despite the increasing weight of the Lexer.
Making It Faster - Porting To C (To Be Completed)
While it would be extraordinarily difficult to port all of the Tokenizer to C, it is envisioned that some form of PPI::XSBooster package could be written as a seperate and automatically-detected add-on to the main PPI package that would take a number of functions from various places, from the Tokenizer Core, Quote Engine, and various other places, and implement them identically in XS/C.
In particular, the skip-ahead methods from the Quote Engine would appear to be extremely amenable to being done in C, and a number of other functions could be cheryy-picked one at a time and implemented in C.
I plan to request assistance on this ONLY after we reach PPI 1.0 however, so that we can be relatively sure that the perl implementations of the various functions won't need to change over time.
METHODS
Despite the incredible complexity, the Tokenizer itself only exposes a relatively small number of methods, with most of the complexity implemented in private methods. The main CWnew constructor creates a new Tokenizer object. These objects have no configuration parameters, and can only be used once, to tokenize a single perl source file.
It takes as argument either a normal scalar containing source code, a reference to a scalar containing source code, or a reference to an ARRAY containing newline-terminated lines of source code.
Returns a new PPI::Tokenizer object on success, or CWundef on error. When creating a new Tokenizer from a file, a dedicated CWload constructor is provided.
Returns a PPI::Tojenizer object on success, or CWundef on error.
get_token
When using the PPI::Tokenizer object as an iterator, the CWget_token method is the primary method that is used. It increments the cursor and returns the next Token in the output array.
The actual parsing of the file is done only as-needed, and a line at a time. When CWget_token hits the end of the token array, it will cause the parser to pull in the next line and parse it, continuing as needed until there are more tokens on the output array that get_token can then return.
This means that a number of Tokenizer objects can be created, and won't consume significant CPU until you actually begin to pull tokens from it.
Return a PPI::Token object on success, CW0 if the Tokenizer had reached the end of the file, or CWundef on error.
all_tokens
When noy being used as an iterator, the CWall_tokens method tells the Tokenizer to parse the entire file and return all of the tokens in a single ARRAY reference.
It should be noted that CWall_tokens does NOT interfere with the use of the Tokenizer object as an iterator (does not modify the token cursor) and use of the two different mechanisms can be mixed safely.
Returns a reference to an ARRAY of PPI::Token objects on success, CW0 in the special case that the file/string contains NO tokens at all, or CWundef on error.
increment_cursor
Although exposed as a public method, CWincrement_method is implemented for expert use only, when writing lexers or other components that work directly on token streams.
It manually increments the token cursor forward through the file, in effect skipping the next token.
Return true if the cursor is incremented, CW0 if already at the end of the file, or CWundef on error.
decrement_cursor
Although exposed as a public method, CWdecrement_method is implemented for expert use only, when writing lexers or other components that work directly on token streams.
It manually decrements the token cursor backwards through the file, in effect rolling back the token stream. And indeed that is what it is primarily intended for, when the component that is consuming the token stream needs to implement some sort of roll back feature in its use of the token stream.
Return true if the cursor is decremented, CW0 if already at the beginning of the file, or CWundef on error.
errstr
For any error that occurs, you can use the CWerrstr, as either a static or object method, to access the error message.
If no error occurs for any particular action, CWerrstr will return false.
TO DO
- Add an option to reset or seek the token stream...
- Implement more Tokenizer functions in PPI::XS
SUPPORT
See the support section in the main module
AUTHOR
Adam Kennedy (Maintainer), <http://ali.as/>, cpan@ali.as
COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) 2004 - 2005 Adam Kennedy. All rights reserved.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.
The full text of the license can be found in the LICENSE file included with this module.